/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) text coherence (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: text coherence
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_Íkalatxt132 - : As the participants in this study received a certain amount of training in three features of coherence (unity, clarity and organization), they knew that the feedback they exchanged would need to target at least one of them. It was found that some students developed a fairly-accurate level of awareness of the degree of coherence they had in their own blog posts. Participants were able to describe their level of satisfaction with their text coherence and even mention the extent to which feedback had played a role in their writing development:
2
paper corpusSignostxt601 - : Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text coherence and judgments of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence . In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29^th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1236-1241). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society . [ [150]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato text coherence:
text coherence
Lengua:
Frec: 23
Docs: 17
Nombre propio: 1 / 23 = 4%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.179 = ( + (1+0) / (1+4.58496250072116)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| text coherence |
: McNamara, D. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247 288. [123]https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975 : McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Butler-Songer, N. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43. : McNamara, D.S. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-287. : McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43. : McNamara, Daniel y Kintsch, Walter. (1996). Learning from texts: effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes. 22 (3), pp. 247-288. : O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2002a). Text coherence effects: Interactions of prior knowledge and reading skill. Ponencia presentada en the 43rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society Inc., Kansas City, MO. |